Showing posts with label Benefits. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Benefits. Show all posts

Tuesday, March 22, 2011

New Health Care Benefits for 2011

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA), better known as “health care reform” and derided by some as “Obamacare,” passed into law with great fanfare last March. If you haven’t noticed any change in the health care system, that’s partly because most of the law’s provisions have yet to go into effect.

Many of the most important changes won’t happen until 2014, including the requirement that insurers cannot refuse to insure someone with pre-existing conditions. Let’s face it — by the time we reach 50, nearly all of us have “pre-existing conditions.” Our chances of being “pre-conditioned” go up as we age –  mesothelioma, for example, is rarely diagnosed in patients younger than 50.

So we’ll have to wait a little longer for that benefit. A few of the law’s other provisions will kick in on January 1, however. Here are some changes that will affect people insured by a private insurance company or by Medicare:

PPACA puts a limit on the “minimum medical loss ratio,” which is a fancy name for the difference between what the insurer receives in premiums and what is paid out in benefits. Now, large group plans must spend at least 85% of premium income on benefits, and for small group and individual policies at least 80% of premium income must be paid out in benefits.

This ratio must be reported to the government, beginning January 1, and if an insurer doesn’t meet the ratio requirement, the insurer must give its customers a rebate.

Beginning January 1, the government is required to create a Community Living Assistance Services and Supports program. This will be a voluntary insurance program to provide benefits to pay for assisted living and long-term care when someone becomes disabled. Details of how the program will work and how people can sign up should be released later this year.

Several changes will affect Medicare — beginning January 1, pharmaceutical companies must provide a 50% discount on brand-name prescriptions filled in the Medicare Part D coverage gap. Subsidies for generic prescriptions filled in the “gap” will be phased in beginning this year.

For those of you unfamiliar with the gap, also called the “doughnut hole” — previously, Part D benefits helped pay for annual prescription drug costs up to $2,700, but nothing above that. A catastrophic coverage program pays for nearly all yearly prescription drug bills over $6,154. But the costs in between  $2,700 and $6,154 must be paid entirely by the Medicare recipient, which is a terrible burden. This year’s changes will bring some relief. The PPACA will close the gap entirely by 2020.

Beginning this year, doctors will get a 10 percent bonus payment for providing primary care services. Medicare also will give a 10 percent bonus to general surgeons working in areas with a shortage of doctors.

Some Medicare co-pays are eliminated, including co-pays for some preventive services and for colorectal cancer screening. Medicare also will pay for patients to receive a personalized disease prevention plan.

This entry was posted on Wednesday, December 29th, 2010 at 3:16 pm and is filed under Uncategorized. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.


View the original article here

Thursday, December 2, 2010

New Study Highlights Benefits of Palliative Care

A new study suggests early palliative care may actually be a better form of treatment for patients with non-small-cell lung cancer than traditional curative care. Patients in the study who were assigned palliative care reported an overall better quality of life, lower levels of depression and survived longer than their traditionally treated counterparts.

The findings, which were reported in the August 19th edition of The New England Journal of Medicine, may seem counter-intuitive. Palliative care n the idea of treating symptoms and improving quality of life for patient as opposed to directly treating the illness n is typically viewed as a last resort by cancer patients. However, these new findings strengthen the idea that choosing palliative care should not necessarily be viewed as “giving up.”

The study involved the randomization of 151 metastatic lung cancer patients into two groups n one that received palliative care and one that received traditional care. Researchers used quality-of-life and depression surveys to conclude that those treated with palliative care were happier and enjoyed a better quality of life at the time of death. More surprisingly, palliative patients survived an estimated two months longer on average than those who went through traditional treatment.

In response to the findings, researchers stress that the potential benefits of palliative care need to be properly communicated by doctors when discussing available treatment options. Presently, much of the medical community perceives palliative care as an inferior treatment option. In some cases, as the study suggests, this may not be the case.

Sources:
http://www.curetoday.com/index.cfm/fuseaction/blog.showIndex/lenahuang/2010/8/20/Palliative-care-at-diagnosis
http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1000678

This entry was posted on Thursday, October 14th, 2010 at 3:13 pm and is filed under Medical news, cancer treatment. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.


View the original article here